The San Francisco Pawn Shop is dead. After 50 years, its doors on Hastings St. across from Save On Foods will shut at the end of August.
Jeff, the owner, confirmed the closure to a Downtown Eastside pensioner who dropped in this morning to see about a watch. The pensioner knows Jeff, whom he says took the place over from his dad. "You still see his dad, Mitch, working in there, part-time."
"They sold the property to people from Hong Kong", the pensioner explains. "Concord Pacific, people from Hong Kong." That's a huge lot; it goes right back to the alley, the pensioner explains.
People on the Downtown Eastside will miss the San Francisco Pawn Shop, the pensioner believes. "People would go in there with all kinds of stuff", he recalls chuckling, "TVs, radios, clocks, watches, diamond rings."
But the San Francisco Pawn Shop owners may have gotten out of the business at the right time. The population of low-income residents who rely on a pawn shop to get through the month, is shrinking on the Downtown Eastside. The upcoming 2010 Olympics has jacked up property values and roughly 12 buildings that have provided cheap rooms to poor people have or are being sold for re-development.
The pensioner believes that with the sale of the San Francisco Pawn Shop property, things are going according to plan for the right-of-center City Council. "They want the area cleaned up by 2010, for the Olympics. They don't want people coming here and seeing all those poor people."
As the Olympics come, the San Francisco Pawn Shop goes. The paper work for the pawn shop property has been completed, the pensioner says. "It's a done deal."
Friday, March 30, 2007
Saturday, March 17, 2007
Carnegie staff lock doors and gossip
Downtown Eastsiders have long viewed the closing of the doors of Carnegie Community Centre for a staff meeting from 9 'til noon every welfare day -- the third Wednesday of each month -- to be an excuse for staff to have a schmoozefest. There may be some truth to that.
One staff person reported that at the last meeting, staff kept digressing into gossip instead of focusing on business. Gossip about what? "That blog," the staff person explained, referring to the Downtown Eastside Enquirer.
So now that we know what was going on inside Carnegie's locked doors, what was going on outside? The usual. A throng of people -- those who don't drink or drug on welfare day and may even be broke as cheques sent via mail don't arrrive until late morning -- was hanging around on the front steps waiting for the Centre to open. Just because it's welfare day, doesn't mean people aren't interested in checking their e-mail on a public computer or using the library.
Labels:
Carnegie Centre,
Downtown Eastside,
Vancouver,
welfare day
Friday, March 16, 2007
Vancouver Sun reporting sloppy on Downtown Eastside
Bob Sarti, now retired from a long career as a Vancouver Sun reporter, recently revealed in a letter published in the Carnegie newsletter that he did not always let the facts interfere with a good story:
Certainly in stories on the Downtown Eastside, a lack of due diligence on the part of Vancouver Sun reporters is noticeable. Take, for instance, Thursday’s cover story in the Westcoast Life section, "Beauty and the Streets".
In the story, reporter Michelle Hopkins took the predictable angle of portraying women on the Downtown Eastside as sex trade workers, drug-addicted, hopeless, hapless, and homeless. That sells papers. Hopkins pointed out that Beauty Night at the Health Contact Centre was organized by Caroline MacGillivray, who got the idea while in the Downtown Eastside researching a movie role by interviewing sex trade workers. Volunteering at WISH Drop In Centre where hookers hang out “exposed me to the women”, MacGillivray explained. “One night I did the hair for one of the street workers. She had tears in her eyes as she thanked me and gave me the biggest hug.” The whole article consisted of variations on this theme.
Volunteer Santina Sorrenenti, is quoted as saying that Beauty night shows these women that there are people out there who “don’t judge them”. Jennifer, a former sex trade worker and cocaine addict, is quoted as claiming that the volunteers at Beauty Night “gave me my self-esteem back." More of the same theme.
This story would be convincing to a reader who did not happen to recognize anybody depicted. But I took a double take at a colour photo accompanying the story -- in the paper edition, not the web -- of a woman relaxing, getting her toenails painted red. The caption read, “Leah, a nursing student, with a client.” I recognized the client: "Hey, that’s Tony!" She's a youngish, forty-eight year old woman with long brown hair which she dyes a shade lighter than her natural colour, and round brown-rimmed glasses. Her real name is Antonia.
Tony doesn’t live on the Downtown Eastside but she knows a bargain when she sees one. She lives in Mount Pleasant, in a housing complex at 33rd and Main, and occasionally drops into the Carnegie Centre which is just next door to the Health Contact Centre. It’s hard to imagine anyone with a bottle of nail polish giving Tony back her self-esteem. She seems to have enough self-esteem to get by; she’s confident, friendly, and has lots of friends. She raised two children. And she’s certainly not sticking a needle in her arm. Or selling her body. And neither are her grown children.
Tony didn’t mislead the Sun. It’s just that when the volunteer was doing a toenail job on her, the Sun was doing a ‘don’t ask, don’t tell’ journalism job on the public.
Vancouver Sun slack reporting about the Downtown Eastside was in evidence as well on the front page of the Friday, Dec. 8, 2006 edition. The headline screamed, “Our Four Blocks of Hell” with a bold subheading, "TV sets dropped from windows." The article covered a report just released by City Engineering about garbage and disorder in the area.
A binner who has also lived for over three decades on the Downtown Eastside, including in the area of the “Four Blocks of Hell”, says he has never known a television set to be thrown out of a window. “People smash tv sets in the alley,” he explained. “I’ve done it myself; they do it to get the electronics out, and the little bit of copper in the picture tube.” Copper can be sold. Computer monitors are also seen lying smashed in alleys and occasionally even on sidewalks, with the copper removed. Smashed tv sets may look to a person from outside the neighbourhood like they’ve been dropped from a window but the binner believes that scenario is unlikely. What is more likely, he believes, is that Janet Steffenhagen doesn’t know her beat.
Even the claim that clothing "thrown out of the area's many. . . buildings" is exaggerated somewhat. Anyone looking overhead as they walk through the four block area can see that for themselves. “You sometimes see clothes or shoes on the telephone lines, especially outside the buildings that house the mentally challenged,” the binner explained. “But it’s not like it’s every second building.”
Vancouver Sun journalists do not always stop at slackness or sloppiness though; they have been known to resort to outright fabrication. Look at the description of the clientele of the Carnegie Centre by Miro Cernetig in the October 30, 2006 edition of the Sun: “On any day or night, you can find them here getting help from social workers, free medical advice or sometimes just some much needed companionship.” Reality check: there are no social workers at Carnegie. The Director has credentials as a social worker but she was hired as an administrator and is burrowed in her top floor office. Reality check: Carnegie is not a place where people can go for medical advice. During a severe flu season, a couple of nurses may do a brief stint in the lobby, sitting at a table with a sign announcing that they're giving flu shots. But they are not there to dispense general medical advice.
In the next paragraph of his story, Cernetig makes a claim that brings to mind the expression, "Who should I believe, you or my lyin' eyes?" Cernetig writes: "The Carnegie’s tiny library is nearly always packed with the Downtown Eastside’s residents, some reading newspapers, some studying for courses to improve their lot in life….” In the 20 years, I have used the Carnegie library, I have never seen anyone studying for courses. I’m not saying that has never occurred. But the Carnegie Library is more of a reading room than a library, a place where people drop in to sign-out and read one of the daily newspapers.
The Vancouver Sun does not limit their sloppy coverage to stories about the Downtown Eastside. The Sun’s Editor-in-Chief, Patricia Graham, pointed out in a leaked internal memo last year that her mistake-prone staff couldn’t even tell the difference between a Palestinian and a Jewish settler when creating a photo caption. Graham noted in the memo that when people see mistakes, it undermines their confidence in the entire newspaper.
“When I was a young reporter, I was told to always get both sides of the story. That’s what was called balance. Like many other reporters, I ignored the rule from time to time; never let the facts stand in the way of a good story. Now retired, I can’t say I’m necessarily proud of it. But that’s the way it was/is in the mainstream media.”
Certainly in stories on the Downtown Eastside, a lack of due diligence on the part of Vancouver Sun reporters is noticeable. Take, for instance, Thursday’s cover story in the Westcoast Life section, "Beauty and the Streets".
In the story, reporter Michelle Hopkins took the predictable angle of portraying women on the Downtown Eastside as sex trade workers, drug-addicted, hopeless, hapless, and homeless. That sells papers. Hopkins pointed out that Beauty Night at the Health Contact Centre was organized by Caroline MacGillivray, who got the idea while in the Downtown Eastside researching a movie role by interviewing sex trade workers. Volunteering at WISH Drop In Centre where hookers hang out “exposed me to the women”, MacGillivray explained. “One night I did the hair for one of the street workers. She had tears in her eyes as she thanked me and gave me the biggest hug.” The whole article consisted of variations on this theme.
Volunteer Santina Sorrenenti, is quoted as saying that Beauty night shows these women that there are people out there who “don’t judge them”. Jennifer, a former sex trade worker and cocaine addict, is quoted as claiming that the volunteers at Beauty Night “gave me my self-esteem back." More of the same theme.
This story would be convincing to a reader who did not happen to recognize anybody depicted. But I took a double take at a colour photo accompanying the story -- in the paper edition, not the web -- of a woman relaxing, getting her toenails painted red. The caption read, “Leah, a nursing student, with a client.” I recognized the client: "Hey, that’s Tony!" She's a youngish, forty-eight year old woman with long brown hair which she dyes a shade lighter than her natural colour, and round brown-rimmed glasses. Her real name is Antonia.
Tony doesn’t live on the Downtown Eastside but she knows a bargain when she sees one. She lives in Mount Pleasant, in a housing complex at 33rd and Main, and occasionally drops into the Carnegie Centre which is just next door to the Health Contact Centre. It’s hard to imagine anyone with a bottle of nail polish giving Tony back her self-esteem. She seems to have enough self-esteem to get by; she’s confident, friendly, and has lots of friends. She raised two children. And she’s certainly not sticking a needle in her arm. Or selling her body. And neither are her grown children.
Tony didn’t mislead the Sun. It’s just that when the volunteer was doing a toenail job on her, the Sun was doing a ‘don’t ask, don’t tell’ journalism job on the public.
Vancouver Sun slack reporting about the Downtown Eastside was in evidence as well on the front page of the Friday, Dec. 8, 2006 edition. The headline screamed, “Our Four Blocks of Hell” with a bold subheading, "TV sets dropped from windows." The article covered a report just released by City Engineering about garbage and disorder in the area.
“Clothing thrown out of the area’s many single-room occupancy buildings becameA woman who has lived for 15 years on the border of the four block area covered in the report remarked that she had never known a tv set to be thrown out of a window. Another woman who has lived in the DTES for over 30 years and eats almost daily at the Women’s Centre near Hastings & Columbia, has heard of a tv set being thrown out of a window -- just once. She emphasized that when something like that happens, it is definitely treated as unusual. “People talk about it.”
tangled on overhead lines and heavier items like television sets were dropped to
the streets, endangering passersby.”
A binner who has also lived for over three decades on the Downtown Eastside, including in the area of the “Four Blocks of Hell”, says he has never known a television set to be thrown out of a window. “People smash tv sets in the alley,” he explained. “I’ve done it myself; they do it to get the electronics out, and the little bit of copper in the picture tube.” Copper can be sold. Computer monitors are also seen lying smashed in alleys and occasionally even on sidewalks, with the copper removed. Smashed tv sets may look to a person from outside the neighbourhood like they’ve been dropped from a window but the binner believes that scenario is unlikely. What is more likely, he believes, is that Janet Steffenhagen doesn’t know her beat.
Even the claim that clothing "thrown out of the area's many. . . buildings" is exaggerated somewhat. Anyone looking overhead as they walk through the four block area can see that for themselves. “You sometimes see clothes or shoes on the telephone lines, especially outside the buildings that house the mentally challenged,” the binner explained. “But it’s not like it’s every second building.”
Vancouver Sun journalists do not always stop at slackness or sloppiness though; they have been known to resort to outright fabrication. Look at the description of the clientele of the Carnegie Centre by Miro Cernetig in the October 30, 2006 edition of the Sun: “On any day or night, you can find them here getting help from social workers, free medical advice or sometimes just some much needed companionship.” Reality check: there are no social workers at Carnegie. The Director has credentials as a social worker but she was hired as an administrator and is burrowed in her top floor office. Reality check: Carnegie is not a place where people can go for medical advice. During a severe flu season, a couple of nurses may do a brief stint in the lobby, sitting at a table with a sign announcing that they're giving flu shots. But they are not there to dispense general medical advice.
In the next paragraph of his story, Cernetig makes a claim that brings to mind the expression, "Who should I believe, you or my lyin' eyes?" Cernetig writes: "The Carnegie’s tiny library is nearly always packed with the Downtown Eastside’s residents, some reading newspapers, some studying for courses to improve their lot in life….” In the 20 years, I have used the Carnegie library, I have never seen anyone studying for courses. I’m not saying that has never occurred. But the Carnegie Library is more of a reading room than a library, a place where people drop in to sign-out and read one of the daily newspapers.
The Vancouver Sun does not limit their sloppy coverage to stories about the Downtown Eastside. The Sun’s Editor-in-Chief, Patricia Graham, pointed out in a leaked internal memo last year that her mistake-prone staff couldn’t even tell the difference between a Palestinian and a Jewish settler when creating a photo caption. Graham noted in the memo that when people see mistakes, it undermines their confidence in the entire newspaper.
Povertarian: a new word on the Downtown Eastside
Ethel Whitty, Povertarian
For decades, "poverty pimps" has been a term used by Downtown Eastsiders to describe the flock of poverty industry workers who descend on the Downtown Eastside everyday. But “povertarians” works better. Dag at Covenant Zone began using it recently and it’s catching on.
Dag’s description of a povertarian brings to mind Ethel Whitty, Director of the Carnegie Centre. According to Dag, the povertarian frequently has the word “community” on their lips. When Whitty got hired as the $104,000 a year Director of the Carnegie Centre, here’s what she told the Courier newspaper:
But what Whitty seemed to prefer when she arrived at Carnegie was a gated community. She rarely ventures outside her third floor executive office to mix with the underclass. She does make an appearance in the cafeteria on veggie burger Tuesdays, sitting at a table surrounded by Carnegie members more carefully vetted than the front row at a Republican convention.
Ethel Whitty. Povertarian.
For decades, "poverty pimps" has been a term used by Downtown Eastsiders to describe the flock of poverty industry workers who descend on the Downtown Eastside everyday. But “povertarians” works better. Dag at Covenant Zone began using it recently and it’s catching on.
Dag’s description of a povertarian brings to mind Ethel Whitty, Director of the Carnegie Centre. According to Dag, the povertarian frequently has the word “community” on their lips. When Whitty got hired as the $104,000 a year Director of the Carnegie Centre, here’s what she told the Courier newspaper:
"I wanted to be director of the Carnegie because I had a real urge to be closer to community, and to be in the middle of community, and this is a real opportunity to do that."
But what Whitty seemed to prefer when she arrived at Carnegie was a gated community. She rarely ventures outside her third floor executive office to mix with the underclass. She does make an appearance in the cafeteria on veggie burger Tuesdays, sitting at a table surrounded by Carnegie members more carefully vetted than the front row at a Republican convention.
Ethel Whitty. Povertarian.
Saturday, March 3, 2007
Vancouver's other Olympic sport
On Friday afternoon I was walking up Main St. on the Downtown Eastside, headed to a coffee shop with my friend J.D. Under the Georgia viaduct, J.D. asked two workers wearing red coats with strips of green fluorescent tape across the back, “How’s business?” It was obvious what business they were in. One of them, a 20-something white guy with light brown hair, a beard and wire-rimmed glasses, was carrying the tell tale plastic yellow pail.
They’d picked up 357 intravenous needles today, this affable man with geometric tattoos on one side of his neck, told J.D.
How many needles do you pick up on an average day?, J.D. asked. “Two hundred to two hundred and fifty,” the man said. Today was busier than usual, he explained as he ducked into the alley by the run-down Cobalt Hotel. That was because they had come across a pile of garbage in an alley; he spread his arms to show how wide the pile had been: “We took over a hundred needles out of there.” Near Carnegie Centre?, J.D. asked. “On the other side of Hastings, in the alley.”
The tattooed man’s partner, a white guy in his late 20’s or early 30’s with dark brown hair, bent down to pick up a needle from the sidewalk in front of a high rise apartment building near Main and Terminal. Needles are easy to spot with their orange tips.
It is common to see workers paid by the Health Consumer Board, the Vancouver Area Network of Drug Users, or United We Can walking the streets of the Downtown Eastside picking up needles. But these workers are too often hidden from sight when proponents of InSite, the supervised drug injection site argue that a sign of the controversial facility’s success is the reduction in the number of needles strewn on the streets. The fact that workers being paid to pick up needles account for a large percentage of this reduction – "Does Tony Clement know where junkies' needles go?" – must be factored into any assessment of the supervised injection site. Afterall, the more than 100 needles that the worker on Friday claimed to have retrieved from a pile of garbage in an alley were on the same block as InSite, at the opposite end of the 100 block Hastings Street.
As we walked ahead of the two workers, J.D. turned to me, “Did you get those numbers?” You could write a story on this, he suggested. “Call it, 'Vancouver’s other Olympic sport.’”
They’d picked up 357 intravenous needles today, this affable man with geometric tattoos on one side of his neck, told J.D.
How many needles do you pick up on an average day?, J.D. asked. “Two hundred to two hundred and fifty,” the man said. Today was busier than usual, he explained as he ducked into the alley by the run-down Cobalt Hotel. That was because they had come across a pile of garbage in an alley; he spread his arms to show how wide the pile had been: “We took over a hundred needles out of there.” Near Carnegie Centre?, J.D. asked. “On the other side of Hastings, in the alley.”
The tattooed man’s partner, a white guy in his late 20’s or early 30’s with dark brown hair, bent down to pick up a needle from the sidewalk in front of a high rise apartment building near Main and Terminal. Needles are easy to spot with their orange tips.
It is common to see workers paid by the Health Consumer Board, the Vancouver Area Network of Drug Users, or United We Can walking the streets of the Downtown Eastside picking up needles. But these workers are too often hidden from sight when proponents of InSite, the supervised drug injection site argue that a sign of the controversial facility’s success is the reduction in the number of needles strewn on the streets. The fact that workers being paid to pick up needles account for a large percentage of this reduction – "Does Tony Clement know where junkies' needles go?" – must be factored into any assessment of the supervised injection site. Afterall, the more than 100 needles that the worker on Friday claimed to have retrieved from a pile of garbage in an alley were on the same block as InSite, at the opposite end of the 100 block Hastings Street.
As we walked ahead of the two workers, J.D. turned to me, “Did you get those numbers?” You could write a story on this, he suggested. “Call it, 'Vancouver’s other Olympic sport.’”
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)