Doug King, a Pivot lawyer, has just announced that he is representing three low income men suing Fusion Security for allegedly brutally attacking them at Harbour Centre mall. Security guards allegedly took the men to an area with no security cameras and beat them
Hopefully Pivot can keep track of the file.
Pivot lost the file of "J", a Downtown Eastsider who they were representing in a law suit against Concord security guards at Metrotown Mall. "J." was brutally assaulted by the guards. He had been out in Surrey working casual on the night shift in a warehouse -- topping up his welfare; he's allowed to legally earn $500. When he got off in the morning, he went for a couple of beer with a co-worker and then went to the company office at Metrotown mall to pick up his cheque. He made the mistake of chatting to a security guard who may have smelled the beer on his breath. The guard told him to leave the premises, which "J." did. J walked quite a distance to a small park, thinking he was off the premises, only to hear a guard order another guard to jump him. J's nose and teeth were broken and he had a long scab down the front of his nose. He now wears dentures. There were credible witnesses to the assault, people who had been walking by and yelled at the guard to stop. An ambulance came but J. didn't use it.
King took the case. He told J. he was optimistic about getting a settlement.
When J.A. phoned King for an update, he said the security firm was not being cooperative. But Pivot had the police report and the witness statements. King later announced that he was leaving the country for a year and he would pass the file on to another lawyer at Pivot. The woman who was supposed to inherit the file at Pivot then told "J" that the file had been lost.
"J" phoned back several times to get an update but didn't get a response.
Where did all of this confidential personal information -- forms had been filled out at Pivot -- about "J"end up? Did somebody leave it on lunch counter at Waves? The statute of limitations on the case has now expired.
On their website, Pivot states that in talking to Downtown Eastside residents, "[W]e’ve heard a lot of stories about harassment and abuse by private security guards, and after hearing several similar stories about negative interactions between private security guards at Harbour Centre from both mall employees and low-income people, we knew we needed to take action on this case."
Myself and other contributors to this site support Pivot's decision to sue Fusion. But the same stories abound about public security guards at Carnegie and other organizations on the Downtown Eastside. Pivot doesn't even mention them. It's almost as if public sector unions pay protection money so that Pivot will look the other way. I wonder how much Pivot gets in donations from unions.
I wonder if Fusion could add to their defense the fact that Pivot is advertising for residents to bring them cases about private security guards, and demonstrating blatant bias by giving a wink 'n a nod to abuses by public security guards in the same neighbourhood. Pivot activist-lawyers put up posters throughout the Downtown Eastside, even on the walls of Carnegie Centre just feet from where public security guards routinely verbally or physically abuse the poor, encouraging people to give them cases against private security guards. ["J" never reads posters; he has complained in the past about missing events because he never reads posters.] Maybe Fusion will have the money to expose Pivot biases because Downtown Eastsiders don't.